Search

Why are Our Inner Voices so Mean and Critical?

Why are Our Inner Voices so Mean and Critical?

By David Hennessy, Clinical Psychologist

David the Psychologist balancing on a mountain peak under a clear blue sky, symbolising mindfulness, perspective, and balance when responding to the inner critic.

Finding balance between self-criticism and self-compassion — David the Psychologist @hennessyclinicalpsychology

Why are Our Inner Voices so Mean and Critical?

Why are our inner voices so mean? The relationship we have with ourselves is the most important one in our lives. Yet many people find their inner dialogue can be surprisingly harsh, saying things they would never say to someone else. That critical inner voice can feel cruel and relentless, but theory supports that its origins were a protective function. It reflects how our brains, histories, and environments shape the way we talk to ourselves. This broader process of self-understanding is explored further in our article on understanding ourselves. Understanding why this happens helps us respond with more compassion, perspective, and balance.

The Inner Critic as a Misguided Protector

Our inner critic often develops as a well-intentioned attempt to keep us safe. The mind anticipates threat and tries to prevent harm. Harsh self-talk can arise as the mind’s way of avoiding rejection, embarrassment, or failure. While these warnings can be protective, they easily become overactive in modern life. Acceptance and commitment and compassion-focused approaches both describe how this once-protective system can become punitive, and how developing self-compassion and psychological flexibility can help restore balance and soften its impact [3, 4, 11].

Early Learning and Internalised Voices

Inner dialogue is shaped by what we heard and felt early in life. If approval depended on success or if criticism was common, the brain learned that being hard on oneself might prevent mistakes or disappointment. These internalised voices can become inflexible or punitive [1, 12, 13].

Negativity Bias and Cognitive Habits

The human brain pays more attention to threat than to safety. This negativity bias once supported survival. Today, it fuels self-criticism by replaying what went wrong more than what went well [2].

Recent Evidence and New Directions

  • Longitudinal links. Self-compassion and psychological flexibility are associated with lower self-criticism and improved mental health over time [7].
  • Emotion regulation mechanisms. Emotional overproduction and perseveration of negative emotion mediate the link between self-criticism and depressive symptoms [8].
  • Interrupting cycles. Compassionate self-protection and values-based action help break self-critical loops [6].
  • Clarifying definitions. Self-criticism involves multiple forms and functions rather than a single process [5].
  • Decentering. Seeing thoughts as mental events reduces their emotional impact [10].
  • Experiential techniques. Chairwork increases self-compassion and reduces self-criticism [9].

Alternative Theoretical Lenses Worth Considering

  • Self-Discrepancy Theory. Distress emerges when actual and ideal or ought selves diverge [14].
  • Internal Family Systems. The critic is a protective part attempting to prevent pain [11].
  • Schema Therapy Modes. Punitive and demanding critic modes can be softened through mode work [12, 13].
  • Self-as-Context. Observing thoughts rather than identifying with them reduces the critic’s power [4, 10].

Changing Our Relationship with the Inner Voice

The goal is not to silence the critic but to change how we relate to it. Instead of arguing with the voice, we can observe it as a mental event rather than a fact, a process explored further in our article on thoughts are not facts. Mindfulness, compassion-focused practice, and psychological flexibility support steadier responses. You might quietly acknowledge, “Thanks, mind, for trying to protect me. I am safe right now.”

Practical Steps Toward a Kinder Inner Voice

Practice noticing without judgement. Name the critic as a protective response.

Consider what it is protecting. Fear, shame, or old pain often sit underneath.

Practice self-compassion. Speak to yourself as you would to someone you care about, rather than relying on forced positivity. This distinction is explored further in values-based positive affirmations.

Practice re-anchoring to your values. Shift focus from avoiding mistakes to living in alignment with what matters, as outlined in let your values be your guide.

Use experiential tools. Chair dialogues and imagery can strengthen compassionate responses [9, 11, 13].

Conclusion

Our inner voice is not the enemy. It reflects protective instincts, early learning, and a survival-oriented brain. With mindful awareness, compassion, and flexibility, inner dialogue can move from blame to balance, supporting growth instead of shame [5, 7, 10]. This perspective aligns with the idea that gentle grounded truth may be more helpful than overly positive reassurance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is my inner voice so harsh?
Harsh self-talk often develops as a protective response shaped by early experiences and the brain’s bias toward threat.

Is self-criticism helpful?
While it may have once served a protective role, persistent self-criticism is linked with emotional distress and reduced wellbeing.

Can therapy help with the inner critic?
Yes. Evidence-based therapies such as acceptance and commitment therapy, compassion-focused therapy, and schema therapy can help.

Do I need to get rid of my inner critic?
No. Therapy focuses on changing how you relate to it rather than eliminating it.

References

  1. Baldwin, M. W., & Dandeneau, S. D. (2005). Understanding and modifying the relational schemas underlying insecurity. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(5), 637–663. 
  2. Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
  3. Gilbert, P. (2010). Compassion-Focused Therapy: Distinctive Features. Routledge.
  4. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An Experiential Approach to Behavior Change. Guilford Press.
  5. Zaccari, V., Mancini, F., & Rogier, G. (2024). State of the art of the literature on definitions of self-criticism: A meta-review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, 1239696. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1239696
  6. Šoková, B., Greškovičová, K., Halamová, J., & Baránková, M. (2024). Breaking the vicious cycles of self-criticism. BMC Psychology, 12, 248. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02250-2
  7. Wong, M. Y. C., et al. (2025). Longitudinal dynamics of self-criticism and self-compassion. Scientific Reports, 15, 13878. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95821-1
  8. Guo, L. (2024). From self-criticism to self-compassion. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06325-6
  9. Kroener, J., et al. (2024). Chairwork and the inner critic. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, 1397925. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1397925
  10. Guo, L. (2024). Mindfulness and decentering meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 15, 1873–1895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02395-6
  11. Schwartz, R. C., & Sweezy, M. (2021). Internal Family Systems Therapy. Guilford Press.
  12. Young, J. E., et al. (2003). Schema Therapy. Guilford Press.
  13. Arntz, A., & Jacob, G. (2021). Schema modes update. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 763670. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.763670
  14. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy theory. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319

Enquiries and Appointments

Hennessy Clinical Psychology

 

Related Blog

Illustration of David Hennessy, Clinical Psychologist, seated in a therapy room, representing a calm, trauma-informed approach to understanding pain and the autonomic nervous system.
Therapy Approaches & Psychological Skills

How the Autonomic Nervous System Responds to Pain

Pain is shaped not only by the body, but by how the nervous system evaluates threat and safety. This article explains how the autonomic nervous system responds to pain and how psychology can support pain management as part of a multidisciplinary approach.

Read More »
David the Psychologist, a bald clinical psychologist wearing a colourful paisley shirt, seated calmly in a therapy room at Hennessy Clinical Psychology, reflecting on attachment wounds and emotional safety. Subtle text reads: David the Psychologist @hennessyclinicalpsychology
Trauma & Attachment

What Are Attachment Wounds?

Attachment wounds describe how early relational experiences shape emotional regulation, adult relationships, and nervous system responses. This article offers a clear, compassionate, evidence-based explanation of what attachment wounds are and how healing is possible.

Read More »