Social situations can be enjoyable, meaningful, confusing, tiring or some combination of these experiences. Autistic adults vary greatly in how they communicate, the relationships they value, the amount of social contact they want and the environments in which interaction feels comfortable. Useful support starts with the individual rather than assuming that autistic communication needs to look more neurotypical.
Autism is associated with differences in social communication and interaction, but contemporary research increasingly shows that communication barriers do not arise from the autistic person alone. A 2025 review of autistic adult communication found that barriers can arise from language, non-verbal communication, environments and communication partners, supporting a more interactional understanding of communication [1].
This is consistent with the double empathy perspective, which proposes that misunderstandings between autistic and non-autistic people can be mutual because people with different ways of experiencing and communicating may find one another harder to interpret. This perspective is influential and supported by a growing body of research, although it should not be treated as explaining every social difficulty.
For an individual adult, the practical question is often not “How do I communicate normally?” but “What helps me understand others and be understood while remaining reasonably comfortable and authentic?”
Some autistic adults prefer direct, specific language and find implied meanings, ambiguous requests, rapidly changing conversations or unwritten social expectations difficult or tiring. Others do not experience these difficulties, or experience them only in particular settings.
Practical strategies can include asking for clarification, checking assumptions, requesting important information in writing, allowing processing time and being explicit about preferences. For example, saying “I need a little time to think about that” or “Could you tell me directly what you need from me?” can reduce the need to infer an unclear expectation.
These strategies are not about placing all responsibility on the autistic person. Communication partners can also help by using clear language, allowing different forms of communication and checking understanding rather than assuming that one communication style is inherently better [1,2].
Autistic adults can value friendship, intimacy and belonging, but the preferred form, frequency and intensity of relationships vary. A 2025 scoping review of 22 studies found substantial diversity in autistic adults’ friendship experiences, including how friendships are formed, maintained and understood [3].
A 2024 systematic review and thematic meta-synthesis of 52 qualitative studies found that interactions with other autistic people were often described positively and were associated with aspects of quality of life, while also emphasising the heterogeneity of autistic experiences [4]. This does not mean autistic people necessarily prefer autistic friends, or that mixed-neurotype relationships are inherently more difficult.
It can be useful to think about compatibility rather than simply social ability. Shared interests, direct communication, mutual acceptance, predictable contact and respect for each person’s need for time alone can sometimes matter more than following conventional ideas about how friendship should look.
Clear boundaries can make relationships easier to navigate for anyone. They can be particularly useful where expectations are implicit or where a person has previously felt pressure to agree, fit in or avoid conflict.
Boundaries might involve how often someone socialises, preferred ways of communicating, physical touch, privacy, time needed to recover after social activity or behaviours that are not acceptable in a relationship. Asking directly can also be appropriate when another person’s expectations are unclear.
Misunderstandings do not necessarily mean that either person has communicated badly. Sometimes people have made different assumptions. Where possible, slowing the interaction down and checking what each person meant can be more useful than deciding who communicated “correctly”.
Personal safety remains important. NICE guidance notes the need to consider vulnerability to exploitation and, where relevant, interventions that support decision-making and personal safety [2]. Respect for neurodiversity does not require tolerating coercion, manipulation, abuse or repeated disregard for boundaries.
Social interaction can require considerable conscious effort for some autistic adults. Noise, lighting, crowds, unfamiliar people, rapid conversation and the need to monitor several sources of information at once can add to that effort.
Some people also camouflage or mask autistic characteristics in social settings. A 2025 systematic review examining camouflaging in friendship and intimate relationships found that autistic people may camouflage in pursuit of connection, while the experience can also carry personal costs [5]. This does not mean masking is always harmful or that every autistic person masks.
Useful adjustments might include choosing quieter venues, meeting for a defined period, arranging one-to-one rather than group contact, using text or online communication, planning recovery time or leaving an event when capacity is running low. NICE guidance similarly recommends considering sensory environments, predictability, clarity and structure when supporting autistic adults [2].
The aim is not necessarily to tolerate more social demand. Sometimes a better outcome comes from changing the setting, expectations or amount of interaction.
Some autistic adults actively want to learn strategies for particular social situations. This may include understanding workplace conventions, starting conversations, managing conflict, dating, recognising unsafe situations or communicating needs more clearly. If these are the person’s own goals, structured learning can be useful.
NICE recommends considering individual or group-based social learning programmes for autistic adults who identify problems with social interaction, using approaches such as explicit rules, discussion, decision-making, modelling and feedback [2]. Evidence reviews suggest that some structured interventions can improve selected social outcomes, but the quality of evidence varies and outcomes should not be interpreted as showing that autistic adults need to adopt neurotypical behaviour [6]. A 2026 meta-analysis of adult interventions similarly found small-to-moderate pooled effects in some domains, with considerable heterogeneity across studies [7].
More recent work is also examining communication-partner training, reflecting the idea that successful communication is a shared responsibility rather than a task assigned only to autistic people [8].
Psychological support may be useful when social situations are contributing to significant anxiety, loneliness, repeated conflict, exhaustion, difficulty maintaining important relationships or uncertainty about boundaries. It may also provide a space to explore identity, masking, disclosure, self-advocacy and the balance between connection and recovery.
Support should be adapted to the person and their goals. It should not assume that more social contact is always better, that eye contact is required for good communication, or that successful therapy means appearing less autistic.
No. Autism involves differences in social communication and interaction, but communication success depends on the people, context and environment involved. Different communication styles can contribute to mutual misunderstandings [1].
Eye contact should not be treated as a universal requirement for effective communication. Preferences and comfort vary, and useful support should focus on communication and goals that matter to the individual.
Yes. Asking for clearer language, written information or additional processing time can be a reasonable communication preference or adjustment.
For some people, yes. Social, sensory and cognitive demands can combine, and masking may add further effort. Other autistic adults may find particular forms of social interaction energising or comfortable.
It can, when the person wants support with a particular concern or goal. Work might focus on anxiety, communication, boundaries, relationships, self-advocacy, conflict or finding more sustainable ways of participating socially. The aim should be collaborative rather than to make the person appear less autistic.
Australian resource: Autism CRC’s current National Guideline uses updated terminology with an increased focus on neurodiversity-affirming practice. Autism CRC: Second edition overview.
We are a Gold Coast Clinical and General Psychologist clinic conveniently positioned in Varsity Lakes.
Therapy is available in person at Varsity Lakes or via telehealth anywhere in Australia.
The easiest way to book an appointment is online.
This practice is not a crisis service.
If you require immediate assistance, call 000. For crisis support, contact Lifeline on 13 11 14.
© 2021–2026 Hennessy Clinical Psychology. All rights reserved.